The Order of Things, 1980 to 1990



   

 

The Gay Pride March routes changed over the years, for the most part the parade surrounded Massachusetts State House, Beacon Hill, Boston common, public garden, and Boston Center for the Arts. We watched most years from my father’s
Studio overlooking Tremont Street.

1970
A twenty-person contingent that marched from Cambridge Common to a rally on Boston Common as part of Vietnam War Protest. Gay Liberation Front carried signs that read Send The boys Home Now.

1971
Preceded by a full week of workshops. The march route encompassed four major stops, Bay Village Bar, Jacques, Boston Police Headquarters on Berkeley Street, State House on Beacon Hill and St. Paul’s Cathedral on Tremont Street. At each stop a speaker listed a set of demands at the State House a call was issued to include Homosexuals in civil rights legislation and eliminate anti-sodomy statues dating from Puritan times.

1977
Number of parade participants had swelled to 7000 mobilized in responses to Anita Bryant’s hateful anti-gay rhetoric. Bryant, singer, fundamentalist Christian, and former Miss America runner-up had emerged as a spoke person for Florida orange juice industry. Representatives from more than 20 gay and human rights organizations, including Congressman Barney Frank and State Senator Elaine Noble marched in the Boston parade in an effort to increase public awareness and promote gay rights legislation in the state.

1978
Renamed Lesbian and Gay Pride Parade; in 1978 Pride observance demonstrated a growing emphasis on Lesbianism as a distinct expression of self-identification.
Instead of inviting politicians and religious leaders to speak at the rally on Boston Common, organizers showcased grass roots voices from the community.

1982
Teacher Eric Rofes emphasized the need for a citywide ordinance that would protect all workers from discrimination based on sexual orientation in both the public and private sectors. In general however pride day seemed to be losing its political edge and many participants seemed ambivalent about participating in a demonstration for Civil Rights.

1983
The lead photograph in the Globe’s coverage of the 1983 Pride Parade featured the AIDS Action Committee’s banner. Widespread shock over the health crisis caused attendance to grow to 18,000 from 13,000 the previous year. There was much speculation about the nature of AIDS and debate over how to fight the disease and increase awareness of it. Several days before the march, more than 600 people attended an open meeting at Faneuil Hall on the effects of AIDS within Boston’s gay community.

1984
Featured Pride memorabilia, camel rides and a hot air balloon that never got off the ground-indicated a shift in the focus of the observance. “It’s a depoliticization of the whole thing, making it into a gay trade fair.” According to Pride Committee Coordinator Marsha Levine, organizers had polled participants and found that “the criticism was leaning strongly toward less speakers and more entertainment.”

1986
Groups as diverse as Black and White Men together, Gay Police Officers and Dykes on Bikes were among the 34,000. Several political developments that year helped to incite the community-in particular, a policy initiated by Governor Michael Dukakis that required the state to take down information on the sexual preference of prospective foster parents in order to place children in “traditional family settings.” This essentially prevented lesbians and gays from becoming foster parents in Massachusetts. In response the Gay and Lesbian Defense Committee urged protesters to place stickers printed with the words “Foster Equality” on the wall outside the State House.

1987
A flag emblazoned with lavender rhinoceros and pink triangle was raised at City Hall the event was also the first to feature a major business sponsor, Digital Corporation. The starting point of the parade changed to city hall plaza, resulting in wide spread confusion: Bay Windows stated that, “at times, the parade seemed like two or three separate marches.” A crowd of 40000 participated in the march, led by Moving Violation (The Womens Motorcycle Club), the Gay and Lesbian Defense Committee and Lesbians Choosing Children, a coalition of women protesting the ban on gay foster parents. Six hundred green balloons were released at the rally in memory of the 600 residence of Massachusetts lost to AIDS in the previous five years.

1993
The Parade route was altered significantly to wind through South End, which had become the popular center of Boston’s gay community. Estimated attendance preceded 100,000 for the first time. The significance of the Pride Day was noted by Karen Lucas of greater Boston business Council: “Because there’s more publicity, it’s easier to come out. Not only are straight people seeing our numbers, were seeing our numbers.”

1994
25th Anniversary of Stonewall uprising. The parade passed reviewing stand in front of the Boston Center for the Arts on Tremont Street, where local politicians awarded prizes for the best floats. News coverage focused on the increasing corporate sponsorship of the celebration and the growing numbers of groups marching under company banners. As a globe reporter wrote: “The smattering of groups marching under their company logos in yesterday’s Gay Pride Parade signals a growing acceptance of gays in the corporate world.”

1995
The Pride Committee limited political speakers in 1995 to the half-hour before the official noon start of the march, which drew an estimated 130,000, co-chair explained, “People say they want pride to be fun. They don’t want it to be political.” Acting on the frustrations felt by many that pride had become apolitical, The Lesbian Avengers organized the first Dyke March. The march took place the morning of Pride, following a route from Ruggles MBTA station in Roxbury to Copley Square, where it joined the main parade. This was also the first year of the Youth Pride March in May, which was a culmination of several positive developments for local gay youth.

2000
One commentator wondered if the aura middle-class respectability that characterized the whole affair was a sign of progress or a step in the wrong direction. Attendance at the rally was affected by the day’s heat and the competition from both the Grass Roots Gay Rights Fund’s Chandler Street block party and the women’s party at Esme. Pride Committee organizers, however, felt that the day had been “successful, inclusive and fun.”

Source: The History Project
www.historyproject.org